
In the course of this assignment, it has emerged that higher education institutions regard the assessment of prior learning as a difficult task, and that many institutions are unsure of the rules that apply. This is a crucial question, since there is reason to assume that a growing number of applicants will request assessment of their prior learning in connection with the scrapping of the “25:4" rule. The basis for assessment is often unclear in view of the very different levels of prior knowledge and experience cited by the applicants. The institutions also see a contradiction between examining each individual´s application on the basis of his or her prerequisites and trying to treat all applicants in an equal and consistent manner. It is difficult to explain to the student concerned what she or he is expected to demonstrate and how this information is to be presented. In addition, the assessment of prior learning has low priority in higher education institutions. One reason may be that the provisions of the Higher Education Ordinance that have applied for some time, are not sufficiently well known, and that it is not clear how they should be applied. Another reason may be the view - often encountered in higher education institutions - that formal requirements are the “proper" way to acquire competence.
In the Agency´s view, assessments of prior learning must be regarded as legitimate, fair, legally valid and reliable. In order to achieve this, higher education institutions must establish quality assurance systems for the assessment of prior learning. They must also create an organisation structure for such assessments, with an explicit division of responsibilities and clearly defined routines for follow-up, quality control and evaluation. The Agency considers that a quality assurance system for the assessment of prior learning should include the following elements: