2003:17 R

Simpler and more useful? On methods of evaluating subjects and programmes

Analysis of the reports of the evaluations of Computer Science, Media and Communication Studies, Latin and Classical Archaeology reveals that the vast majority of the observations on the programmes relate to the conditions in which they are offered and their implementation. The reports contain, for instance, appraisal of the recruitment of students, how programmes are organised and the numbers and formal qualifications of the teachers. Focus on outcomes could concentrate instead on the quality of student papers, the students´ own perceptions of the programmes and the skills demanded in the labour market.

By appraising a selection of essays in each subject, the assessors could gain some impression of the general level of educational attainment. Systematic analysis of semester questionnaires in which teachers and students account for their experience of the extent to which the goals of programmes are achieved and the way in which they are implemented would help to provide well-founded insights into how the programmes function. Finally feed-back is proposed from the labour market concerning the way in which individual programmes attain general objectives and impart both academic and vocational skills. Feedback of this kind could be arranged through the use of Statistics Sweden´s data on individuals awarded degrees four years previously.

Focus on the outcomes of programmes could also enable simplification of some stages of the current evaluation model for both the higher education institutions and the National Agency. For instance the number of site visits could be reduced. This development would match those taking place in other countries, such as Scotland and England.